Risk communication is a critical step in addressing contaminants of emerging concern, especially high-profile compounds like per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). There are differences in the messaging and methods by which environmental agencies and health departments share information with various audiences. Given the wide breadth of regulatory efforts, sampling strategies, and general involvement with PFAS, ECOS has gathered information that use best practices so states can have guidance on how to effectively and efficiently address contamination.
What is PFAS Risk Communication?
PFAS risk communication is:
Goal-oriented
Empowers sound, risk-based decision-making while building trust and maintaining credibility.
Transparent
Communicates scientific uncertainties, data limitations, and evolving regulatory actions in a timely and accessible manner, and responds to community feedback.
Collaborative
Engages diverse stakeholders and co-regulators with clearly defined roles, and maintains two-way open communication with the public.
Actionable
Uses simple, easy-to-understand messaging to define the problem, actions, and next steps.
Adaptive
Incorporates performance metrics, community feedback, and new science to refine communication strategies over time.
Tools & Resources to Help You Communicate with Different Audiences About PFAS
For the General Public
For Decision Makers
For Public Water Systems and Other Specific Communities
How Do States Communicate About PFAS?
States define PFAS
“A group of man-made chemicals used since the 1940s to make many products, including fire-fighting foam and stain-resistant, water-resistant, and nonstick items.” — From Arizona
States describe routes of exposure to PFAS
“When drinking water is contaminated with PFAS above EPA’s MCLs , it is likely to be people’s biggest source of PFAS exposure.” — From Colorado
States explain
associated health risks
“Possible health effects… include dyslipidemia, decreased vaccine antibody responses, increased risk of ulcerative colitis, [etc].” — From Pennsylvania
States identify how they are addressing PFAS
“DEQ is gathering information on potential PFAS impacts… through sampling of public water supplies, ground water, surface water, and sediments.” — From Montana
Examples of Communication Materials from ECOS Members and Other Organizations
Get More Insights on PFAS from ECOS
PFAS Resources and Information
ECOS is helping states communicate and coordinate with EPA, other federal agencies, and each other about developments and best practices pertaining to PFAS
Examine PFAS Industry Data from Members
ECOS members have shared information on industries that use PFAS. We have compiled the information into an interactive table and collected links to other resources and considerations for evaluating further PFAS use in industries across the U.S.
